There are so many good cameras to try and some of them are also affordable for a wider range of users, such as Sony Alpha a6000 Vs Canon 200D Mark II. These cameras can be a great companion for your journey into photography or just a casual tool to take stills and videos. The two can produce beautiful shots and are easy to use, but they are not identical so let’s see which you may like better here.
In this comparison, we are going to talk about:
- How to Start with Photography
- What are Sony Alpha a6000 and Canon 200D Mark II
- How are the Camera of Sony Alpha a6000 and Canon 200D Mark II
- How are the Image Quality from Sony Alpha a6000 and Canon 200D Mark II
- How are the Autofocus in Sony Alpha a6000 and Canon 200D Mark II
- How are the Sony Alpha a6000 and Canon 200D Mark II for Video Recording
- Sony Alpha a6000 Vs Canon 200D Mark II
Starting With Photography
When you are still new to something and asking what equipment to buy, people with more experience will most likely recommend starting from the bottom and working the way up slowly to enrich the skills and even making sure that we are still in this hobby for years to come. The same with photography because there is just so much to learn before getting a grip on what we are doing. For those starting with photography, here are some tips to consider:
- Avoid buying expensive equipment at the beginning of the journey because it is possible to get beautiful photos with affordable point and shoot. The more pictures you are taking, the more experience and skills you can gather to upgrade into a higher model. We understand that sometimes it is tempting to buy the most hyped camera and lenses but they should fit best once we can optimize the performance later.
- Consider buying a tripod even if you prefer to shoot handheld because a shaky hand is a best recipe for a blurry photo. Beginners who are not familiar with the camera may want to use a tripod first to assist their work and this equipment can be useful for various shooting applications as well, especially if you are often recording video.
- Get something simple to be carried and operated. We never know when the ops come so it is best to keep the camera close to you and making it simple makes sure we can carry it easily as well.
- If you are often strolling around to hunt for photos, we can take notes or try it first with the smartphone camera and come back later to the list that you have made to capture with a real camera or when the weather is better.
- Even if you don’t get out much or travel often, there are actually many interesting objects to photograph around. Since our eyes are already used to the room or anything around the house, they don’t seem as interesting and this is why we have to see them with fresh eyes. You can browse around for tricks to make these objects more interesting.
- Just like when buying a new device, we are not familiar with the camera yet. It is great to play around with the settings and this way we can find so many different combinations for your creativity. There are so many free sources including the manual itself to learn from. If you are viewing the photos from a computer, we can check the EXIF data to see the settings used.
|Sony Alpha a6000||Canon 200D Mark II|
|Product Dimensions||4.72 x 1.77 x 2.64 inches ||2.7 x 4.8 x 3.6 inches
|Shipping Weight||0.7 pound||1.5 pounds
|Best offer||Check price||Check price|
About Sony Alpha a6000 and Canon 200D Mark II
Now when you are ready to start the journey, it is time to see what the market has to offer because there are so many to choose from. The newest series or addition from your favorite line is always interesting to buy and if you want to get something for the starter and beginner, it is probably wise to consider the older or budget cameras instead. The reason being they are easier on the pocket and many are actually very reliable and powerful options to start your journey.
Sony and Canon for example are two powerhouses when it comes to cameras and while they are known for different qualities, you can always rely on their collection. As a company they provide a wide range of options for different types of users and their goals but we do think older cameras from their lineup are still relevant and worth buying today. Depending on which seems to pick your interest, our choice may vary too.
For those who want to focus on capturing beautiful shots and having a reliable collection of lenses to match with, the Sony Alpha a6000 and Canon 200D Mark II are two great alternatives to many high-end cameras today. They may not be fresh anymore but the system is solid and you can start with these cameras with ease. In comparison they are about the same in so many factors including their own pros and cons that accompany the device itself. Read also: Sony Alpha a6000 Vs Nikon D3500 here.
The core is actually very similar because both are your typical 24MP CMOS sensor with respective E and EF mount type for the collection of compatible lenses to work with. The cameras should work well for different users including experienced photographers who want to have a second camera to accompany their main one. In comparison, the Sony Alpha a6000 and Canon 200D Mark II are delivering very similar performance with some noticeable differences, especially on handling type with the fact that a6000 is a mirrorless and the latter is a DSLR.
Sony Alpha a6000 and Canon 200D Mark II Camera Body
While often called bulky, DSLRs in this price range are not huge at all yet side by side they are going to be both thicker and taller compared to typical mirrorless with the same sensor size. This is what happens with Sony Alpha a6000 and Canon 200D Mark II as well because a6000 is slimmer and since it only has an EVF, the camera is also shorter. It is noticeably light as a housing only at 344 grams while your 200D Mk II or SL3 is about 453 grams.
Depending whether you will often use their viewfinder or not, the ergonomics of these cameras is slightly different due to the placement on this panel and also their rear screen. We love how compact and light a6000 is but this camera is only featured with a tilting screen which is quite limiting nowadays. It is noticeably better on 200D Mk II because the screen is not articulating. The a6000 has two control dials while the 200D has one.
Sony Alpha a6000 and Canon 200D Mark II Image Quality
Now for the most important part let’s see what these affordable cameras can offer. First off, they are the same 24MP APS-C camera with reliable performance. Sadly there is no image stabilization built-in the cameras but it is to be expected and as long as you can mount a stabilized lens, they are going to work really well for a wide range of applications. The photo taken with Sony Alpha a6000 and Canon 200D Mark II are similarly good under decent lighting but they are not identical.
Out of the camera, side by side Sony is probably more saturated and the color looks slightly darker as well. When you zoom into details, it becomes more noticeable that the camera seems to sharpen the image too compared to Canon. In detail 200D Mk II or SL3 is smoother and more natural and gives this warmth tone, especially for skin colors. The noise is better on SL3 as you crank the ISO higher as the camera is better in low light.
Sony Alpha a6000 and Canon 200D Mark II Autofocus
Next we want to talk about the autofocus which is an important factor if your subject will move or you choose to do tracking a lot with the camera later. Sony is always promising with their reliable AF but do note that a6000 is a pretty old camera and here is why 200D Mk II is just as good as the mirrorless, especially if you choose to shoot in live view. Both Sony Alpha a6000 and Canon 200D Mark II are working wonderfully at keeping your subject focus.
The hit rate is high; around 70%-80% of the whole shots are taken with perfect focus and Canon probably did better here by landing more shots. But, Canon also slows down when using continuous focus as it is now shooting at 3.5fps instead of 5fps while on the other hand Sony managed to do 11fps which is impressive for the price point.
Sony Alpha a6000 and Canon 200D Mark II for Recording Video
Lastly for the recording ability, the Sony Alpha a6000 and Canon 200D Mark II are versatile yet can be limiting for the hybrid shooters. Just like most cameras in this price range, their recording time is limited to 30 minutes but 200D Mk II is already 4K in resolution instead of 1080. The 200D Mk II is also slightly more convenient because it has an articulating screen which can be helpful for monitoring.
Sony Alpha a6000 Vs Canon 200D Mark II
The Sony Alpha a6000 and Canon 200D Mark II are good cameras for those who want to start their photography journey or anyone who wants to have a dedicated camera for capturing stills. In comparison 200D is a newer choice and also slightly better at processing hence we do think the photos look better straight out of the camera but while it has a good autofocus, the camera will also be slower than Sony when taking shots continuously. It is a DSLR and has thicker housing but also an OVF that can help your battery.
There are plenty of good cameras and these two are among the alternatives. The a6000 is great for the speed, point and shoot style while if you will often take stills as well as recording videos, the latter is a more promising choice.